In-Depth Analysis of Na Hong-Jin’s film ‘The Wailing’

ANALYSIS/INTERPRETATION (Not Review) – Understanding ‘The Wailing’

Beauty and devastation, that’s what I was left with once the credits rolled. Just like the shot of the corpse hanging from a tree, in the middle of the road. Or the scene where the devil quotes Jesus.
The film isn’t visually scary, but its unresolved nature and the kind of philosophical questions it poses, they haunting in a different way altogether. All this done in the most spectacular and captivating 150 minutes, without a single wasted second. After two terrific thrillers (‘Chaser’ and ‘The Yellow Sea’), Na Hong-Jin’s first foray into horror, and we already have a masterpiece.

What’s the origin of evil and how does it consume/infect people? Temptation or bad influence can turn one against their loved ones. The film treats violence itself as a communicable disease. The zombie-like murdering sickness is akin to losing one’s soul. Jong-goo mother asks in one of the beginning scenes, “What kind of fucker kills people?”; it’s an opinion Na deeply shares. Though the film revolves around random violent deeds committed by various individuals, it’s interesting to note that all the violence happens offscreen; Na is more interested in the motivations, consequences and moral dilemmas. Fear and desperation can make people do terrible things. He highlights that few actions are objectively bad, even if one tries to justify them at the moment through rationality and causality (like the way Jong-goo and his friends kill The Jap). He also condemns blind faith and the actions people take driven by it. The way he makes his point about not believing things recounted by unreliable sources is hilariously thought-provoking; the priest asks Jong-goo, “Did you see with your own eyes? How can you be so sure without seeing for yourself?”

Christian symbolism is littered throughout the film: Use of fishes, goats and locusts. 12 deaths (number of apostles). 7 possessions (number of deadly sins). I’ll mention more of them whenever they relate to my observations. Situations from ‘The Exorcist’, ‘Evil Dead’, ‘Prisoners’, ‘Contagion’ do come to mind, but the film is a beast in itself. And to set the atmosphere, though CSI is mentioned, modern science is deliberately kept outside of the film’s environment. The camera is supposed to represent capturing of souls; many old faiths have this superstition towards photographs being taken.

The first act of the film deals with a lot of xenophobia. The way people live in a misinformed reality formed by their echo chambers, rife with rumours and stereotypes, it becomes easy to assign blame on an unknown entity with bad ancestral history (taking into account, early 20th century Japanese colonialism and subsequent mistrust). It also explores how legends, stories and personal experiences shape the way we think about the world around us and informs our actions.

The film starts off deceptively simple, with bumbling cops solving unusual murders in a rain-drenched town (not unlike the premise of ‘Memories of Murder’). The film’s name as well as the town’s name, is ‘Gokseong’, meaning ‘wailing’ (literally translates to ‘the sound of crying’). Even with crazy things happening around, the humour balances things off and eases us into the environment. It maintains a confident tone throughout, while efficiently blending tropes of cop thriller, possession horror and family drama. But then the jokes become less frequent as we, along with the lead protagonist Jong-goo, are thrown into a world of chaos and ambiguity.

When unfathomable, inexplicable things happen to your loved ones, how do you make sense of it, and how do you cope with it? I liked how Na uses fishing metaphor to explain the randomness of misfortune. Na apparently made this film after several of his close friends died in succession and he tried to find meaning as to why these things happened to them, and found very little.

Jong-goo’s dilemma and the structure of the film’s narrative, both efficiently convey the Horror of Uncertainty. We face the same questions that haunt Jong-goo – What does evil look like? What happens if one can’t distinguish good from bad, right from wrong? Na drives that terrifying thought right through our minds; it even brings morality into question.
The simultaneous exorcism scene (one of the best shown in films) shows how similar good and evil look (just the colour of the sacrificial animals were different). What better way to show this ambivalence than make a character transfigure into the devil and utter the very same words used by Jesus after his resurrection? (the film’s initial Bible quote) Is it good disguised as evil, or was it evil disguised as good all along? (The scene captures the essence of the film brilliantly; it overwhelms me every single time. Ah, and that score)
[Though I have to say, I don’t think the devil scene is supposed to be taken literally. Many of the earlier demon visions were character point-of-views or dreams; even this one occurs in the presence of a single doubting character. It’s The Jap as well as the film saying, “You wanted me to be the devil, so here I am!” And even if it was the actual devil in the scene, he might have just appeared in that moment through The Jap. Or it was God himself, outraged at the deacon’s misjudgement.]

The film was essentially born in the editing room, with the director cutting out chunks which might have made the story clearer, thus allowing multiple interpretations. No matter how many times one re-watches the film and studies the scenes, there just isn’t enough information for one to firmly assert a singular conclusion. The film is a perfect example of selection/confirmation bias; it demonstrates the mind’s ability to perceive “truth” in nearly anything. Without proper evidence or enough information, two events that happen to coincide can’t be classified as ’cause’ and ‘effect’; that’s one of the central themes of the film.

Let’s examine few of the major interpretations of good and evil in the film. It’s by no accident that the three Shamans/Ghosts are played by an old man, a young man and a woman – reference to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit – the trinity. And clear Jesus parallels can be seen with two of them. While doing research on the film, Na asked himself, “Is there a God? If there is, would he be always good?” – this is important in order to understand the film.

i) The Jap, the name by which he’s derogatively referred to in the town, may have been a saviour shaman all along, who arrived in the town to get rid of the sickness or resident demon. He’s a fisherman, and Jesus famously called himself ‘fisher of men’. He’s misunderstood by the majority of the town people, killed by them, then rises again. There’s even a crying scene under the rocks in the forest which is reminiscent of Jesus crying in Gethsemane. That would make the female shaman/ghost, Moo-myeong (translates as ‘no name’), the resident spirit (good or evil depending on her mood). She can tempt, test, curse, punish and reward whoever she likes.
This interpretation even works as a sharp socio-political allegory. Moo-myeong is a direct reference to South Korea’s current president, Park Geun-hye, who has strong links to shamanism through the Eternal Life Church and her advisor Choi Soon-sil, the instigator of the latest scandal that has led to her impeachment trial. So, in the same way, Moo-myeong is manipulating people (through rumours and dreams) to distrust the foreigner and oust him. We never see The Jap doing anything bad. The only time he’s seen performing a ritual was to counter her spell (on the zombie). The devil-reveal scene would seem to imply that racism makes targeted people seem like monsters. The only one who seems to realize the truth is Hyo-jin, Jong-goo daughter, who symbolizes the children in general. At one point after shouting, she even mumbles, “You don’t even know what’s important.”
In this scenario, Il-Gwang is just a petty money-minded shaman who comes to town, interprets the situation wrongly, tries to cast the death hex on the wrong shaman, realizes it later and warns Jong-goo until it’s too late.

ii) The Jap and Il-Gwang, both are shamans under the control of an evil spirit. In the opening scene, The Jap uses two hooks for the worm (bait), symbolizing the two are working together. They wear the same loincloth, have similar rituals, capture souls by taking photographs. Il-Gwang is shown to drive on the left side of the road (like that of Japan, not South Korea). Both are shown to be scared of Moo-myeong. They go from place to place, curse people, possess their souls and offer it to the devil. [The Jap owns a hell-hound] That would make Moo-myeong the town’s guardian spirit, and the film shows the war between these two sides. She symbolizes purity through the scene where she’s continuously pelting stones at the officers; Jesus says, “Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to cast a stone.” During the double ritual scene, another one is happening simultaneously (which isn’t shown), done by Moo-myeong to cast off the evil spirit possessing The Jap; the way The Jap gets hurt doesn’t correspond to Il-Gwang’s hex (check the editing). So when The Jap is killed by the road, he was just a regular shaman (not possessed); after his death, the evil spirit regains control over him. She guides and helps Jong-goo throughout; others too, since we see the snapdragons at the scene of the first murder as well. She even tests Jong-goo’s faith at the last crucial moment, but he fails, just like Peter (who denied Jesus thrice before the rooster crowed). She was protecting Jong-goo’s family all along, but once Jong-goo sinned (by committing murder), she wasn’t able to help him explicitly. She laid a trap as a last resort, but the sinner had to be kept outside and faith had to be tested.

iii) All three of them are powerful ghosts competing with each other to collect and offer more souls to a higher spirit, in order to extend their life and power. The mysterious murdering-sickness can be someone or something else’s doing, and these three are there in order to acquire more souls for themselves, and foil the chances of the other two. We see different photographs of the afflicted people in both The Jap and Il-Gwang’s possession.

iv) All three are powerful ghosts in their own right (a blend of God and Devil). They generally try to save people from harm or an evil spirit’s possession. But sometimes, when they themselves get angry at someone (because of certain laws not being followed), they curse them. They free the ones which have been cursed by others. Making each of them lawmaker, tempter, curser, judge and executioner. The ordeal Jong-goo goes through is an elaborate test of faith and morals, like the way Job is tested in the Bible. When he comes across a wounded, half-dead body (of The Jap) on the road (like the parable of ‘The Good Samaritan’), he discards the body instead of providing help, thus killing the person in need.

v) There’s no supernatural element at all. People are actually getting affected by a rare breed of mushrooms that makes them hallucinate and kill their loved ones. They rely on the various available beliefs to make sense of what’s going on and try to cope with them.
Even the mushrooms allude to the highly-debated psychedelic origins of Christianity (related to early traditions, fertility rites, etc.) It’s certainly intriguing to relate out-of-body experiences and meditative trance to origins of god in Judeo-Christian tradition or otherwise. [Knowing how meticulous Na is with his stories, I don’t think the mushrooms are included by accident.]

Now with these varying elements, one can come to so many varied conclusions. Who do YOU think is good/evil? – The answer to this would depend on the person’s experiences and religious belief, just like a specific omen can mean conflicting things to people from differing religions/beliefs. The film shows the conflict and confluence of ideas between Christianity, Buddhism, and Traditional Korean & Japanese Shamanism. When catastrophe strikes, fer spreads like a virus, and people are often confused in deciding whom/what to trust.

The father-daughter relationship and its inherent helplessness, and the loss of innocence are explored in a heartbreaking way.
Six years in the making, with such attention to detail, perfect casting (kudos to the freakishly brilliant child actor), spellbinding background score and sound editing, jaw-droppingly good cinematography (which makes even death look beautiful), and crisp editing, Na Hong-Jin has made one of the best horror movies of 21st century, one that truly evokes horror even in the mind of a non-believer.

Murmurs of the Sentient (short film) – Shot List

SCENE 1 (int. office)
shot 1 girl (in formal business attire), looks happy, gets seated in a chair long shot
shot 2 cellphone rings, she receives it medum shot
shot 3 expression turns blank close-up
shot 4 girl picks up bag and files, leaves office medium shot
shot 5 (if possible) from behind, we see the the girl leaving work long shot
shot 6 walking down the stairs aerial shot
SCENE 2 (ext. street)
shot 1 girl smoking a cigarette medium shot
shot 2 smoking long shot
shot 3 blows smoke shoulder shot
shot 4 stubs cigarette low angle shot
SCENE 3 (ext. house)
shot 1 putting in keys long shot
shot 2 opens door pov shot
SCENE 4 (int. house)
shot 1 enters home long shot
shot 2 walks across long shot
shot 3 dumps bag and files close-up
shot 4 (if pos) a work award falls down from table medium shot
shot 5 (if pos) it lies on the floor, with the girl’s lower half visible just beside medium shot
shot 6 walks away long shot
shot 7 flips through bucket list pages in her diary pov shot
shot 8 tosses diary aside medium shot
shot 9 examines pills in drawer pov shot
shot 10 examines rope medium shot
shot 11 examines scissors on table pov shot
shot 12 examines knife medium shot
shot 13 places knife on bed pov shot
shot 14 opens cupboard pov shot
shot 15 lays out dress on bed medium shot
shot 16 starts unbuttoning shirt medium shot, then pans sideways
shot 17 we see the girl dressed in traditional indian wear (ghagra-choli) camera pans back to previous position
shot 18 looks at herself in a long mirror long shot
shot 19 opens her hair and runs fingers through it in a don’t-care manner medium shot
shot 20 fakes a smile, then turns blank medium shot, diff angle
shot 21 strikes a pose, then turns stiff medium shot, diff angle
shot 22 gets seated on the bed long shot
shot 23 knife zoom shot
shot 24 blood dripping to the ground medium shot
shot 25 girl lying on bed with cut wrist (aerial shot, if possible) long shot
shot 26 girl closes eyes zoom shot
random glimpses (family, places, party, friends, laughter, etc.)
shot 27 child running around, giggling, throwing around books long shot
(waves hitting the shore, someone digging, etc.)
shot 28 loud bangs on the door medium shot
shot 29 boy Iin traditional Indian wear – sherwani) opens eyes close-up
shot 30 boy lying on bed with cut wrist (aerial shot, if possible) long shot
shot 31 looks at hand medium shot
shot 32 wipes blood with cloth pov shot
shot 33 washes face in front of mirror in washroom, stares for a while medium shot
shot 34 walks down the stairs aerial shot
SCENE 5 (ext. terrace)
shot 1 walks across long shot
shot 2 walks till the edge medium shot
shot 3 looks down pov shot
shot 4 turns to the side completely and looks ahead medium shot
shot 5 extends his hand, girl places his hand on his pov shot
shot 6 feet to neck (holding hands, but ropes or chains on necks) faces unseen medium shot, panning up
shot 7 girl’s head and boy’s face visible, blank expression long shot
shot 8 a tug on boy’s rope and the expression changes to a smile medium shot
shot 9 boy places ring on girl’s finger high angle shot
shot 10 still smiling, the girl places head on boy’s shoulder, expression turns into a blank stare medium shot
shot 11 blank eyes of the boy zoom in
SCENE 6 (int. office)
shot 1 boy (in business attire), walks to his chair, gets seated long shot
shot 2 picks up his phone, receives call medium shot, then pans to side
END

In-Depth Analysis of Denis Villeneuve’s film ‘Enemy’.

https://i0.wp.com/www.entertainmentwallpaper.com/images/res1920x1080/movie/enemy02.jpg
In my opinion, the movie is shot and constructed in a way that one may find more than one story in it; that’s the beauty of the film.
I will offer y’all two theories, one simple linear story which can be enjoyed by viewers who want a dark uncomplicated tale about duplicated existence, and another a complex non-linear story which can be enjoyed by movie-lovers who love twisted surrealistic psychological thrillers.
——————————————————

THE SIMPLE LINEAR DYSTOPIAN THRILLER VERSION

Theme – Some controlling authority (The Government, or some other highly intelligent group) is curbing individual expression by duplicating each and every person in the city.

From start to end, all the scenes are in order. We see History Teacher Adam listen to his mother’s voicemail in the car, and Actor Anthony in a sex club (with his building’s lobby guy).
The story starts with Adam who is a history teacher. We get glimpses of his life, through his classes, his apartment, his girlfriend. His monotonous life is disrupted when he randomly watches a movie recommended by his friend, and comes across a side-actor who looks exactly like him.
“Every dictatorship… they censor any means of self expression.”

He can never be an individual again.

https://i0.wp.com/www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/blogs/browbeat/2011/09/29/hugo_chavez_caption_contest/Enemy_streetcars.png.CROP.promovar-mediumlarge.png
The web imagery throughout the film (few of them shown below) are metaphors for the intricate and treacherous web lain across the city, and the spiders represent authority and control. Though Saramago’s book ‘The Double’ doesn’t have any reference of spiders, his book ‘The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis’ has a passage which compares the fascist police and their allies to spiders.

https://i0.wp.com/images2.static-bluray.com/reviews/10126_4.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/blogs/browbeat/2011/09/29/hugo_chavez_caption_contest/Enemy_windshield.png.CROP.promovar-mediumlarge.png
https://shoton35.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/untitled4.jpg
Even the fascist salute on the wall represents authority and dictatorship.

The central irony of the subject is that Adam, who is a History Teacher and an expert on totalitarian governments, doesn’t see the web that’s overtaken the city until he finds himself stuck in it. When he searches for his lookalike Anthony and finally meets him at the hotel room, he discovers that both of them share the same scar on their chest; a doppelganger can have same physical attributes, but something like a scar has a personal relevance (and can’t be by coincidence). He is extremely shocked, panics and leaves the room.

If you’re confused by what Adam’s mother tells him, “You have a respectable job, a nice apartment…” and think it’s in contrast to what she says in the voicemail, you are looking to much into it; in the voicemail, she says, “How can you live like that?”, referring to the empty and boxed state of the apartment, and not the apartment itself. She also says, “I think you should quit that fantasy of being a third rate movie actor.”; it means, his mom doesn’t believe whatever lookalike incident Adam mentioned to her. She thinks it’s a story he made up to fulfill some deep-rooted fantasy of being an actor (since that’s the lookalike’s profession). “You have enough trouble sticking with one woman”; this suggests Adam also has commitment issues like his counterpart Anthony (we see Helen being suspicious of Anthony in their introduction scene).

Later, Anthony, who is tempted by Adam’s girlfriend, tries to make a deal with him; he says he’ll disappear forever after a date with his girlfriend. Adam complies, but later seems pissed, and goes over to Anthony’s house.He meets the building’s lobby guy on the way who mentions about the sex club and the new keys being sent out.
When Adam looks around the apartment, and comes across a framed picture which is exactly similar to the one he has at home (the torn one). This is when he realises the extent of the web of deceit; the controlling authority has even gone to the extent of replicating memories in the two individuals’ lives.
When he meets Anthony’s wife, he behaves a little different. We don’t know whether the wife realises it’s Adam or not. She asks, ‘How was your day at school?’, and Adam panics. Actor Anthony might have been in acting school (we don’t know for sure) because all his acting gigs were quite menial (side-roles), or maybe she realises it’s her husband’s lookalike Adam and is okay with it because she is tired of her real husband’s adulterous ways.
Later, Adam feels guilty for taking advantage of the situation and starts crying. Helen starts comforting him. Meanwhile, Adam’s girlfriend, Mary, notices the ring mark on Anthony’s finger and stops having sex. While they’re going back, they get into an accident, and both of them die. We have to assume that Adam discovers this in the morning (we see the channel being changed, but it might not have been the first announcement of it), and is ready to take over Anthony’s life as well.
After finding the sex club’s key in the envelope, he plans to visit it and lets Helen know he’ll be busy at night.

When Adam enters the room, we see a giant spider backed up against the wall in complete fear; it’s a metaphor for the controlling authority’s fear of Adam since he has eliminated his lookalike (he is an individual now) and has an idea of what’s on in the city. So he’s capable of anything now. Adam exhales in relief, on finally having come out of the web.

————————————————————————–

THE COMPLEX (BUT MORE FASCINATING) NON-LINEAR SURREALIST PSYCHOLOGICAL THRILLER VERSION

Theme – A man with identity disorder (split personality) trying to cope with commitment and control issues.

Anthony and Adam are alter-egos of each other; they’re the same person. The actual person is Anthony Claire (aka Daniel Saint Claire); we know this because of his various small acting roles from years 2000 to 2006. His mother never mentions the son’s name; always calls him ‘honey’ or ‘darling’. The name ‘Anthony’ is used by various characters in the movie, while the name ‘Adam’ is only used by Adam himself and no one else.

Anthony’s profile (acc. to me):
Anthony is from a well-to-do family (notice his mother’s apartment).
He is a History Major, but has a passion for acting. He hasn’t had much luck with it though; his filmography includes 3 menial roles in films and few ads (2000-2006), so we know, he’s not a successful actor.
He’s married to Helen. He has always been struggling with commitment issues, and feels quite subjugated by the rules of monogamy.He likes blueberries.

“Chaos is order yet undeciphered.” (a line from José Saramago’s novel, ‘The Double’, on which the movie is based)

The entire movie gives us a glimpse into Anthony’s subconscious, showing us bits and pieces of memory from here and there; it’s not in chronological order. The story begins with a one-night stand with a girl named Mary (this is the actual first scene). They drive till the ‘Breezeway Inn’ and hook up in Room No. 221. While they’re having sex, Mary notices the tan-less mark on the ring finger and feels bad when she realises that he’s married. On their way back, they get into a fight, and eventually, into an accident; this is where he gets a mark on his chest.
After the accident, his wife Helen comes to find out about the affair and throws him out of the house. Anthony moves into a new apartment. He even tries again with Mary. They meet at his new apartment; she comes in and asks, ‘How are you?’ (which a girlfriend wouldn’t ask). But at night, when she’s sleeping, he tries to tease her into sex and almost rapes her. She gets irritated by his aggression and leaves in the middle of the night. He tries to mend his ways , starts a decent job (as a History Teacher) under the pseudonym ‘Adam Bell’ because he might be embarrassed to use his real name. He even invites his mother over to his new apartment once (we can tell that by the voicemail we hear in the first scene).
He has a monotonous and boring life at his new apartment, and badly craves to go back to his wife.
All this lasts only for a few days, or only a week or two (his apartment’s unpacked and boxed condition is evidence of that), until his wife comes back to him and tells him that she’s pregnant. They decide to give their marriage another shot.

He moves back to his old apartment, everything goes well and good for a few days, Then suddenly, he realises the burden of his committed life, wife, children, monogamy… and it takes a toll on him; he’s not able to bear the pressure. He keeps replaying the days he spent at the other apartment (as History Teacher Adam Bell). Though in reality, it was quite monotonous and uneventful, he keeps replaying those memories in his mind again and again, slowly reconstructing it into a period of time where he was happy and free (essentially), had a girlfriend, and everything… This is where the split in his psyche occurs.
Notice the two classroom scenes where he talks about control, dictatorships and Rome; the student arrangement is different in both.
All the scenes showing Mary at Adam’s apartment, she’s wearing the same black top with a skirt.

“…dictatorships use strategies to control ideas, knowledge.” – Adam Bell says in the movie.
“Sometimes you have compulsions that you can’t control coming from the subconscious… they are the dictator inside ourselves.” – Denis Villeneuve, the director.
Here, the subconscious is the dictator, limiting knowledge between both the alter-egos. From this point on, Anthony and Adam are two different personalities who are unaware of each other’s existence. He goes to work as Adam Bell, and when he reaches home, he is struggling actor Anthony (Daniel Saint) Claire.

This is where his internal struggle between the two identities begin. We see glimpses of memories and reconstructed memories from here and there.

Adam is recommended a movie by his colleague at work. He stumbles across a side-actor who looks exactly like him.

Anthony’s wife Helen comes across the note in Anthony’s pocket. She goes to see who Adam is, and comes across her own husband. She wasn’t aware of her husband’s new job and his other name. She’s completely shocked when she sees him there. She goes and sits on a bench next to his, but he talks to her as a stranger. She goes back home completely frightened; she’s worried about her husband’s mental health, and feels guilty that she may have caused it somehow (with these new responsibilities). When they have a conversation, she’s immensely sad and worried, and says, “What’s happening?”, to which her husband responds, “I really don’t know what you’re talking about.”. Then she says, “I think you know.” She doesn’t know what to do about the situation, and wonders deep down if her husband is really mentally ill or if he’s pretending.

Anthony suggests they meet at ‘Breezeway Inn‘. They meet in the room Anthony hooked up with Mary before the accident (Room No. 221). When they confront each other, and notice each other’s exact same scar, part of him is calm and curious, while the other part starts realising something fishy, begins to panic, and leaves the hotel room.

Adam goes and meets his mother. (Note: For both the personalities, the mother is the same. They might have gone and met their mother on several occasions, and she might not have noticed the differences much. She’s happy that he’s in a proper profession now.) Adam says, “I don’t like blueberries.”, to which her mother responds, “Ofcourse, you do.”, which further confirms that Anthony is the real self (who likes blueberries). She also says, “You have a respectable job. (She’s referring to the History Teacher wokr he’s been doing since 6 months) You have a nice apartment. (referring to the one he stays with Helen) And since we’re being frank here… I think you should quit that fantasy of being a third rate movie actor.”; she never liked her son’s stint in the acting business.

At the point, let me tell you that Spiders in the movie represent women and control in the protagonist’s mind.The next scene shows a giant spider on top of the city; there’s a monument in Toronto called ‘The Mother’ (picture below).
https://i0.wp.com/aphs.worldnomads.com/michelefacciotto/28808/IMG_3605.jpg
Notice the controlling way in which his mother talks to him.

His mind is finally aware of the dual existence (confirmed when Adam sees the complete version of the torn photograph at Anthony’s apartment), and plans to get rid of the negative part (i.e. Anthony). He hatches a subconscious plan; he tempts Anthony part of his mind with Mary, and makes Anthony hook up with her. He goes to Anthony’s apartment as Adam. Helen notices the change in behaviour, and understands it’s the other version of her husband. She takes his hand keeps it over her belly (indicating that it’s their baby). By mistake, she even asks, “How was your day at school?”. She’s anyway tired of her actual husband’s philandering ways, so she wants to see how this version of her husband is.

The subconscious plan is to kill off Anthony part of his mind by recreating the memory of the accident, but this time killing Anthony along with it. This is his way to fight his demons. He still feels quite guilty and sad about it, and sits there crying in the living room (or he might also be remembering the last time he cheated on her, and how badly it ended). Helen comes and tries to console him. She even says, “I want you to stay.” She likes this version of her husband, and by saying this, she means she wants this part of him to stay. Maybe, she realises he is going through some internal struggle.

The next morning, Adam wakes up all happy, after having sacrificed the negative part of himself. He discovers the key to the sex club in the envelope. He asks Helen if they already have any plans that night because he may be going out. At the first sign of temptation, even the new version of himself is easily seduced. Helen understands this as soon as he asks her that question. We see a giant spider backed up against the wall, in fear (of being squashed again) and on the offensive. She’s sure that he will cheat again; no matter how much tries to change, his basic instincts are still the same. Adam (Anthony) exhales in acceptive disappointment, realising that “history repeats itself”.

The scene in the beginning of the movie, the one at the sex club, is actually the last scene in this story. It’s Adam (in Anthony’s getup) followed by the lobby guy (since he didn’t get a separate key). It’s a place where people pleasure themselves by seeing things which give the control back to them (the spiders are being squashed here). His final reaction in this scene suggests that he realises, he is back to square one.

——————————————————————————

Thanks for reading. Hope it helped. Let me know. (www.facebook.com/akash.sebastian) Do ask if yo have any doubts with my theories.
Last time I had this much fun solving a movie puzzle was ‘Mr. Nobody’, and before that, ‘Mulholland Drive’.

Possible Explanation for Mr. Nobody (Movie)

MrNobody_2D_DVD_packshot_3

The most evident explanation of the story is that the various parallel lives the 118-year-old Nemo Nobody claims to have lived are all in the imagination of the 9-year-old Nemo, who is forced to choose between his parents, and thus has to analyze which decision would lead him to a better and happy life. This is why when he finally arrives at the decision, everything crumbles because he doesn’t need them anymore. [They also show reporter’s face as of one of the passengers on the train in which his mother leaves. This proves that the reporter is just one of the projections in his imagination (future world) from his own memory (of the day when his mother leaves).

[Note: one should remember that unborn Nemo was not touched by the Angel of Oblivion, so he remembers everything (from parallel lives and imaginations alike) as well as he can predict future sometimes.]

So, the 9-year-old Nemo, when confronted with a crucial decision of choosing which parent to live with, combines his prediction skills and imagination to analyze each of the paths which his decision would lead. In the decision to stay with his mother, he falls in love with Anna, but their happiness is short-lived; they either separate and never meet, or they get married and he dies. In the decision to stay with his father, he falls in love with Elise, but he doesn’t have a happy future in any of the subsequent paths; he either marries Elise, who is unhappy and still in love with Stephano, or he marries Jeanne but being still in love with Elise. After seeing all possible futures, deaths, loves ,etc, till the age of 118, 9-year-old Nemo finally realizes that it is not necessary for him to choose either of his parents and have disastrous futures; instead, he chooses a completely different path, leaving his parents, and pursuing Anna, the one true love of his life.

Then the final scene, the one in which 118-year-old Nemo, on his death bed, says to the world it is the best day of his life, is actually from the real future. He has had a happy life because he got to spend his happy predicted life with Anna (the love of his life). Presently he is ecstatic and calls it the happiest day because now within a few minutes, because of the Big Crunch, he will be able to spend time with Anna all over again.
As the clock strikes 5:50, he cackles and gets up, awaiting his reunion with Anna.